top of page
Search

The Truth Behind Increasing SEND Budgets for Mainstream Schools and What It Means for EHCPs

The recent headline claiming that each SEND child in mainstream schools will receive an increase to the £6,000 per child budget sounds promising at first glance. It suggests more funding and better support for children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Yet, this headline can be misleading. The reality behind the funding changes is more complex and requires a closer look to understand what it means for schools, SEND children, and Education, Health and Care Plans (EHCPs).


This post explores why the headline might mislead, how SEND funding currently works, and what the proposed changes could mean for children with moderate needs and the use of EHCPs.



How SEND Funding Works in Mainstream Schools


Mainstream schools receive funding to support SEND pupils through different channels. One key element is the £6,000 threshold, which refers to the amount schools get to support a child with SEND before an EHCP is usually considered necessary.


  • Top-up funding: Schools receive a base amount to support SEND pupils. If a child’s needs exceed this, local authorities may provide additional funding.

  • EHCPs: These are formal plans that outline the support a child with significant SEND requires. They come with dedicated funding, often above the £6,000 threshold.

  • Non-ring-fenced funding: The £6,000 budget is not always strictly allocated or protected for SEND support. Schools often have discretion over how to use this money.


Currently, many schools do not allow Special Educational Needs Coordinators (SENCOs) to use the £6,000 funding freely for children without an EHCP. This means children with moderate needs might not get the support they require unless they have an EHCP.



Why the Headline About Increasing Budgets Can Be Misleading


The claim that the £6,000 budget for each SEND child will increase sounds like a straightforward boost in resources. However, the reality is more nuanced:


  • No ring-fencing means no guaranteed increase in support

Even if the overall funding increases, schools may not dedicate this extra money specifically to SEND pupils without EHCPs. The funding is often part of the general school budget and can be used elsewhere.


  • Potential reduction in EHCP applications

The changes aim to reduce the need for EHCPs by encouraging schools to use the increased funding to support moderate needs. While this sounds positive, it could mean fewer children receive formal assessments and protections that come with EHCPs.


  • Variation in school policies

Since SENCOs currently cannot always access the £6,000 funding for children without EHCPs, the impact of any increase depends heavily on how individual schools manage their budgets and priorities.



What the Changes Could Mean for Children with Moderate Needs


Children with moderate SEND needs often fall into a grey area. They may struggle in mainstream classrooms but do not qualify for an EHCP. The proposed funding changes could affect these children in several ways:


  • More support without formal EHCPs

If schools use the increased funding effectively, children with moderate needs might get more tailored support without the lengthy EHCP process.


  • Risk of inconsistent support

Without the legal protections of an EHCP, support depends on school policies and resources. Some children might benefit, while others could be overlooked.


  • Pressure on SENCOs

SENCOs may face challenges balancing the needs of children with and without EHCPs, especially if funding is not clearly allocated.



Eye-level view of a classroom with a teacher supporting a child with learning materials
Teacher supporting a SEND child in a mainstream classroom

Caption: A teacher provides individual support to a SEND child in a mainstream classroom, illustrating the importance of effective funding allocation.



The Role of SENCOs and School Leadership in Funding Use


SENCOs play a critical role in managing SEND provision within schools. Their ability to access and allocate funding directly affects the quality of support children receive.


  • Current limitations

Many SENCOs cannot use the £6,000 funding for children without EHCPs, limiting their flexibility to address moderate needs.


  • Potential for change

If schools allow SENCOs more control over increased budgets, they can better tailor support to individual pupils.


  • Need for clear guidance

Schools require clear policies to ensure funding increases translate into real benefits for SEND pupils, not just budget adjustments.



What Parents and Guardians Should Know


For parents and guardians of SEND children, understanding these funding changes is crucial:


  • Increased funding does not guarantee more support

Ask schools how they plan to use any increased SEND budgets and whether this will affect your child’s support.


  • EHCPs still provide important protections

While reducing unnecessary EHCPs is a goal, formal plans ensure legal rights and tailored support.


  • Advocate for your child’s needs

Engage with SENCOs and school leadership to understand how funding impacts your child and raise concerns if support is insufficient.



Looking Ahead: What Needs to Happen for Funding to Work Better


To make the most of increased SEND budgets, several steps are necessary:


  • Ring-fencing funding for SEND support

Protecting the money specifically for SEND pupils ensures it is not diverted elsewhere.


  • Empowering SENCOs

Giving SENCOs more control over budgets helps target support where it is most needed.


  • Clear communication with families

Schools should explain how funding changes affect support and involve parents in decisions.


  • Monitoring and accountability

Local authorities and schools must track how increased funding improves outcomes for SEND children.



The headline about increasing the £6,000 budget for SEND children in mainstream schools creates hope but overlooks important details. Without ring-fencing and clear policies, extra funding may not reach the children who need it most. The goal to reduce EHCPs for moderate needs is understandable but should not come at the cost of formal protections and consistent support.


Parents, educators, and policymakers must work together to ensure funding changes lead to real improvements in SEND provision. Understanding the complexities behind the headline is the first step toward meaningful change.


 
 
 

Comments

bottom of page